Britain, Financial Times, by George Parker in Brussels
Tension between Europe trade protectionism and free market camps is expected to reach a new level next month. At the appointed time, they will have a fierce argument on whether to continue imposing anti-dumping duties on cheap Chinese and Vietnamese shoes.
”I can’t do anything more in resolving the dispute, I will stand aside and see governments how to resolve their differences”, European Union trade commissioner, Peter Mandelson concluded.
Peter Mandelson tomorrow will propose that European Union stick to a plan to impose anti-dumping duties on Chinese and Vietnamese leather shoes though the plan has encountered opposition from a majority of EU member states.
Only when most of EU members support Mandelson’s proposal, otherwise the anti-dumping duties, which introduced in April, will end. And then cheap shoes will flow into EU.
Mr Mandelson’s officials express the proposal reflects the great effort Mandelson have made between the two camps, while reflecting the technical analysis of suspected dumping of China and Vietnam.
Mr Mandelson persists in the decisions, which he proposed on August 3, putting the duty of striving for support on Italy, France, Spain and other countries that take a protectionist attitude, relying on them to win more countries to approve their protectionist standpoint, thereby obtaining a majority support of the EU s 25 member states.
Last time there were 14 countries, headed by England, Denmark, German, Sweden and so on free market countries, informally opposed Mandelson’s plan.
The plan will impose 10 percent and 16.5 percent punitive duties on Chinese and Vietnamese leather shoes respectively.
“This depends on people who keen on our proposal how to gather force, and obviously the result of the poll will be very close to, ” one of Mandelson’s spokesmen said.
For Mandelson, the proposal cannot win the support of the majority of members are not entirely a disaster. He is doubtful of the role of European Union’s traditional anti-dumping policies. He has pointed out that many European manufacturers who make shoes in China and Vietnam has suffered from such anti-dumping duties.
Some north European countries where hardly have shoe industry argued that retailers and consumers are the losers from such policies.